Last Conflict Based Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we propose an approach to guide search to sources of conflicts. The principle is the following: the last variable involved in the last conflict is selected in priority, as long as the constraint network can not be made consistent, in order to find the (most recent) culprit variable, following the current partial instantiation from the leaf to the root of the search tree. In other words, the variable ordering heuristic is violated, until a backtrack to the culprit variable occurs and a singleton consistent value is found. Consequently, this way of reasoning can easily be grafted to many search algorithms and represents an original way to avoid thrashing. Experiments over a wide range of benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
منابع مشابه
On resolving Conflicts between Arguments
Argument systems are based on the idea that one can construct arguments for propositions structured reasons justifying the belief in a proposition. Using defeasible rules, arguments need not be valid in all circumstances, therefore, it might be possible to construct an argument for a proposition as well as its negation. When arguments support conflicting propositions, one of the arguments must ...
متن کاملCase-based reasoning in employee rostering: learning repair strategies from domain experts
The development of methods for solving real world scheduling problems such as employee rostering requires the extensive domain knowledge of manual rostering experts. Rostering problems are subject to numerous conflicting constraints and are difficult to solve. Automated rostering has attracted the attention of the scientific community over the last three decades, however the systematic represen...
متن کاملGeneralized Conflict Learning for Hybrid Discrete/Linear Optimization
Conflict-directed search algorithms have formed the core of practical, model-based reasoning systems for the last three decades. At the core of many of these applications is a series of discrete constraint optimization problems and a conflict-directed search algorithm, which uses conflicts in the forward search step to focus search away from known infeasibilities and towards the optimal feasibl...
متن کاملA Conflict Context Reasoning Method based on Dempster-Shafer Theory in Ubiquitous Computing
In this paper, one conflict context reasoning method based on Dempster-Shafer theory is proposed. Firstly the context conflict problems are illustrated and partitioned based on theory of evidence. Then the context model combined with Dempster-Shafer theory is presented and applied to the reasoning method based on Dempster rule of combination. The effectiveness of this method is verified with a ...
متن کاملPruning Search Space in Defeasible Argumentation
Defeasible argumentation has experienced a considerable growth in AI in the last decade. Theoretical results have been combined with development of practical applications in AI & Law, CaseBased Reasoning and various knowledge-based systems. However, the dialectical process associated with inference is computationally expensive. This paper focuses on speeding up this inference process by pruning...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006